User:Story Plucker/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Floy Agnes Lee

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose from the class provided options with the hopes of having a quality article to learn to evaluate.

Evaluate the article
LEAD SECTION~


 * INTRODUCTION SENTENCE - Floy Agnes "Aggie" (Naranjo Stroud) Lee was a biologist who worked on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamosas a hematology technician.
 * LEAD INCLUDES - Articles of major importance = Floy Agnes work thought out WWII
 * Lead does not include outside information, not in the article
 * Lead is fairly short in this article

CONTENT~


 * The article is about Floy Agnes Lee and it provides her life important work
 * content is up to date
 * no missing context.
 * I've seen longer wiki articles, so I would agree this one is skim

TONE & BALANCE


 * article is neutral
 * no heavy claims
 * viewpoints presented and represented
 * viewpoint accuracy described
 * natural reader.

SOURCE AND REFERECES


 * yes all sources are backed up
 * are sources are on topic
 * all sources are current
 * links to sources are sourceful.

ORGINZATION AND WRITING QUALITY


 * Article is decently written- it seems naked, but it has information
 * No errors
 * article is broken down and sectioned

IMAGES AND MEDIA


 * only one picture in article - links in article have better photo attachments
 * Image put in article was captioned
 * not enough images

TALK PAGE DISCUSSION


 * S
 * A

OVER ALL IMPRESSIONS


 * Over all status - decent, informational but boring
 * strength in education.
 * should improve with trying to get readers engagement