User:Stphjoey

'The Article Evaluation'

#BELLLETSTALK

Pros of the article.

•	The article is neutral.

•	External sources for further reading are provided.

•	Most of the references advance Bell Let’s Talk funding requirements and donations

•	The sources have no biases, are up-to-date with the issues of mental health information, anti-stigma campaigns, and social advocacy.

Cons of the article.

•	The name of the article is distracting since the title has no direct inferencing on mental campaign-I would think it is about muteness or verbal disorders.

•	The article focuses on corporations and companies on their input towards mental health stability more than the influence on the individual’s mental health.

Areas of improvements

•	The report can be improved by discussing the contributions of individuals to the move against mental health discrimination ad backing up with the relevant evidence.

•	Further conversations regarding the presentation of the topic to reduce biases towards the participation of corporations should be progressed so that individuals as well can contribute towards the campaign (Wikipedia).

Stphjoey (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)