User:Strawberryliz/Equity feminism/McKennaKita Peer Review

General info
Strawberryliz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Strawberryliz/Equity feminism
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Equity feminism

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content that was added to the article was neutral, relevant, and up to date. The sources that she had used all seemed to be published within the past couple years and seem reliable. I randomly clicked through some of the links for the sources and they all seemed to work and don't need any updating. The sources that were cited and added to the article were all accurately cited. The content that was added added value to the article and was written in a concise way. An image could be added if an appropriate one is found, but I don't think it is absolutely necessary. I believe that the contents that were added to the article helped improve the overall quality of the article. The strengths of the content added are that it is informative, adds to the quality of the article, and the content added is clear and easy to understand. One improvement that could be focused on is adding a little more content based on the talk page. See if there is any additional information that other think might be needed and research that to add to the article.