User:Strike2426/Self-insemination/Bio Neuro Student Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Strike2426


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Strike2426/Self-insemination?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Unable to find the current version.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead is concise and it is clear what your main topic is but you would definitely benefit by giving some more detail on what the remainder of your article will be discussing.

The body of the article seems well researched. One way you could improve the body of your article is to divide your sections to improve organization. I will suggest having a separate section for the process of self insemination and have the parental energy cost in another section. Then you can proceed these sections by talking about sexual reproduction in the species in comparison. This can help create emphasis on the costs and benefits of each without directly stating that one method of reproduction is better than the other. This is important because you must keep in mind you are not trying to convince readers of a certain perspective, you are stating facts. References used seem valid and images are relevant and allow readers to better visualize the species that could otherwise be difficult to picture.

Article body is in need of subtitles that can help readers better understand what you will be discussing in your sections.

Overall, the information seems well researched and concise. It can be generally improved by organization and subtitles.