User:Strudel3/User:HighQualityWater/Residue (chemistry)/Strudel3 Peer Review

General info
Whose work are you reviewing?

HighQualityWater

Link to draft you're reviewing

User:HighQualityWater/Residue (chemistry)

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Residue (chemistry)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead does a good job of including everything that will be talked about in this article, while being clear, concise and carrying a neutral tone. I think the introductory sentence could be reworked to be more specific and encapsulate more of what the article is about.

Content:

The content added is up to date and relevant, although I would recommend separating the "chemistry and other fields" into two sections and talking about them individually. The content does not address a gap in wikis equity. Minor grammatical changes could be made, but sentence structure and the flow is good. "Residue can also refer to molecular structure, defining a single atom or multiple" Is worked very similar to the one from the wiki article and should be reworded or cited. Picture/ images could be used to help the reader heighten their understanding.

Tone and Balance: A neutral tone is carried throughout and no apparent bias or persuasion is seen.

Sources and References: Recent and relevant sources are used and do a good job adding to the article while supporting the claims made by the author.

Organization: Improvement could be made in regards to the organization by using headings and adding picture to make it more visually appealing rather than just chunks of text. Otherwise the organization is clear and concise with a good flow.