User:Student number one/Evaluate an Article

Everything is relevant to some extent to the topic, although it does feel like the idea of digital health is so broad and has so many interpretations that the sections make senses, but seems a bit overkill to the original topic. Information out of date would be the inclusion of COVID-19 in a way that makes it seem like it is still going on, but it happened four years ago. I don't believe the article misrepresents data to marginalize a minority community. An improvement to this article could be changing of the title to better encompass the information given. The article sems to be neutral with no true biased points of views being represented. Possible over representation of left leaning views present in the article, but it's kind of hard to say. Links work on the citations. The talk page is highly organized, well thought out, and references an ample amount of article and citations.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)