User:Studentuw123/Equity co-investment/TayG1201 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Studentuw123


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Studentuw123/Equity_co-investment?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Equity co-investment

Lead
The lead has a concise introductory sentence but I feel like it doesn't give a description of the article's major sections. I think there could be a sentence or two added to give more clarification on what an equity co-investment is/purpose used for?

Content
I like how you deal with specific equity gaps in the limitations section. Content is up to date and relevant.

Tone and Balance
The entire limitations section focuses on the drawbacks so I was thinking you could add another section to make it more neutral and talk about the benefits/positive aspects. It will even out the article. I also think it would be helpful to somehow provide a description or specific example section of an equity co-investment.

Sources and References
I would try to add more sources in the article, because there only seems to be around 1 or 2 sources per paragraph. The more links the better to reference the information you provide.

Organization
It is organized well- clear and simple! Maybe add another section to spread out the information.

Images and Media
There is only one image, maybe add one more?

Overall Impressions
There were some good contributions made to the limitations section, I would just say add more sources to support the information, and to keep the article neutral, add a benefits section as well! If you could, I would try to add another section whether it be referencing specific examples or how it works detailed, etc. I would also take the names out when referencing who stated what, and just say "a potential drawback is, or one idea is...". Ex: Social status and experience are two forms that co-investment opportunities rely on and can provide limitations for deals to go through. Trying to maintain neutral sentences, and less essay-like. I really like the organization of the article, how it is concise and easy to understand!