User:Subaitar34/Parole/Kristiedelvalle Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Subaitar34
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Subaitar34/sandbox

Content

 * The content is relevant and up-to-date and provided a very detailed summary of all the current facts regarding parole modern history and debates. There was a good balance of perspectives on parole and an effective use of facts from the sources.

Tone and Balance

 * The tone of the content added was neutral and didn't appear to have a heavily bias towards a particular position, it simply stated facts that the original version was lacking. The parts added balanced out the information on the original version because it elaborating on the facts that were already there, which made the context a lot easier to understand. Overall both sides of the parole debate are represented in regards to the claims each side stands by.

Sources and References

 * All new content is backed by reliable and current sources and all reflect the topic of parole. Good variety of sources, all of which were used appropriately.

Organization

 * This new section was intriguing and introduced a lot of important details that the old article failed to mention. The writing was clear, easy to read, and free of any spelling or grammatical errors. The only thing I would suggest is to make sure to put the Debates and Reform Efforts on Parole in title format to separate it from the previous section.

Overall impressions

 * The content being added will definitely improve the overall quality of the article. It adds a ton of new current insight that the older version needed in order to be all-encompassing of the parole topic. Great job making the new sentences flow with the older ones.