User:Subaitar34/Parole board/Kristiedelvalle Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Subaitar34
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Subaitar34/sandbox

Content

 * The content added was relevant to the topic of parole boards and how they are organized. All content is up-to-date, and added important details that the original version lacked.

Tone and Balance

 * The content was neutral and none of the wording seems to be have a bias. These details added appear to be a significant contribution to the the section because they are facts typically left out of conversations on this topic. The last paragraph was an essential contribution too because it really tied the rest of the section together and balanced the opinions of both sides of the debate.

Sources and References

 * Each claim is backed by a reliable source, which are all current and relevant to the topic. All links work.

Organization

 * The content is all well-written and uses good language that is easy to read and understand even if you are new to the topic. No spelling errors, but I think there is a grammatical error somewhere at the end of the sentence "parole boards throughout the states...feel the need to do to ensure job security". I think you meant to add a "so" to "feel the need to do so to..".

Overall impressions

 * The content definitely improved that overall quality of the section, making it feel much more complete and easier to understand given there are many parts to the conversation of parole in politics. It brings in facts about the board in a neutral way that is important to the discussion. Great job!