User:Such0051/Iron Springs Bog SNA/Quovi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ianccoff, Such0051


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iron_Springs_Bog_SNA&oldid=1150542948
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Iron Springs Bog SNA

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is well-written and is a great summary of the rest of the article, though it is the only place I noticed a grammar error (Iron Springs Bog is not capitalized in the third sentence!).

The content is all relevant and up to date. There were some places where I thought more detail could be added, such as the chemistry section. It is not clear to the reader what a calcium/barium quotient might be. I also thought the nitrogen cycling section could use more context and comparison to other fens. This section also called the fen a bog (it would have to be capitalized to be a shortened version of the full name) and the organic matter accumulation section which mentions comparison to bogs in the area. I think this point could use some clarification. It was not clear if there were only two scientists who have done research at the SNA, if this is the case it may be good to mention it. If not, any other research available could at least be touched on briefly. Despite these small nitpicks, the content is overall very high quality and very well-explained.

The tone seems to be fairly neutral, and I appreciate the mention of the Anishinaabe people. I don't think any claims or perspectives are over-represented.

There could be more sources used, but the ones used are relevant and current.

I thought the organization was great!

The images are also great, I really like the ones you chose. My only suggestion here would be a broader picture of the SNA's overall landscape.

I think this is a great topic to make a new page on, and you did a good job starting from scratch.

Overall, I think I just have some minor suggestions to make the article more clear in its content. I think that this is a great article even without those edit, and the writing is perfect in tone and style for Wikipedia. Great job!