User:Sudokologist/General anaesthesia/Tdaprano Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sudokologist


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * General anaesthesia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * General anaesthesia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead has been updated appropriately and reflects current expert consensus opinion on this topic. It is very clear and concisely conveys the point of the article. A thorough list of sources are used in the article and include primary and secondary sources. Secondary sources support specific points. Information is up to date and relevant. Neutral language is used and does not support a particular perspective. "Patient" is extensively used throughout the article; this could be adjusted as WikiProject Medicine recommends trying to avoid the use of the term. Very comprehensively describes general anesthesia and its many facets with well-organized sections. Media used is relevant, captioned, and appropriate. Overall, this content enhanced the article quality significantly particularly by providing additional cross-references and in simplifying expert language into simpler terminology. Each of the goals outlined in the talk page were clearly followed to completion. Excellent work! Tdaprano (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)