User:Suenm845/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Social media use in politics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I see a lot of political information on social media when I'm online and I was curious about the history of that.

Evaluate the article
Lead section-- Broad overview of the topic but it could use a bit more information and there is one wording error.

Content-- Solid amount of reputable & relevant information but some of the sections inside the main body of the page are in a nonsensical order. Additionally, two quotes are used in a place where there is no need for quotes. There is more information needed in the Election Results section. Content is generally up to date but the content focuses around major news in the political social media sphere and could benefit from introducing some of the smaller incidents.

Tone and Balance-- In one paragraph the tone feels slightly left leaning but the article is generally neutral.

Sources and References-- Majority of important links work and are solid sources. Sources would benefit from more diverse writers.

Organization and Writing Quality-- Most sections are well written but some sections are in the wrong order or are incomplete.

Images and Media-- Lacking. Images are not appealing and not captioned well (or at all). Could benefit from pictures of examples of politics on social media.

Talk Page Discussion-- Solid talk page with lots of great ideas that haven't yet been implemented. Article is part of WikiProject and needs more work before it's solid.

Overall Impressions-- Solid article in progress that needs a good amount of work on organization. The article could benefit from more time, more eyes on it, and more updates and edits.