User:Sugar Bear/Bakshi proposal

Opposition restriction discussion
See the Article milestones history at Talk:Ralph Bakshi and recurring nitpicking made at FAC No. 9, FAC No. 8 and FAC No. 7, including those by User:Steve and User:DocKino.

FAC instructions state: "Before nominating an article, ensure that it meets all of the FA criteria ..." If actionable issues raised in a previous FAC have been addressed, and the article has been heavily edited between nominations when actionable issues were raised in previous FACs, it may be assumed that the article does, indeed meet FA criteria. Each time an article is nominated without reviewers willing to strike Opposes based on issues that have been resolved, reviewers, delegates, and Gimmetrow (GimmeBot) expend time and energy. On the other hand, some article improvement is achieved at FAC.


 * I submit the following FAC opposition restriction for community consideration:

All FAC discussions for the article Ralph Bakshi should be deleted due to bias, and the opposing users, including User:Steve and User:DocKino, may not comment on the new FAC discussion, unless they are willing to work on the issues they claim exist within the article themselves, or to admit that they are wrong and that the article is, indeed, up to FA standards, as it has been for several nominations.

Submitted by Ibaranoff24 (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)