User:Sugar Tian/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?

Talk:1 Second Everyday

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Because I have heard of it before and I also have used it for a while. So, I think as a user I can better evaluate the objectivity of this article, etc. The background of this article is easy to understand and I feel comfortable with it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introduction is very good. The introduction clarifies the topic and makes it clear that the article is centred on the 1Second Every app. At the same time, the introduction gives a concise and detailed description of the main features of the app and information about the developers.

The content is a bit lacking. The content of the article is relevant to the topic. It introduces the inspiration and funding of the app's founder, the achievements of the app, and how to use it. The content is perfectly in line with the topic and easy to understand. However, there are some problems with the graphics in this article, the editor last updated it in March 2021 and wrote that the app's compatibility mode is for IOS 13.0. But now it's September 2022 and IOS has been updated to 16.0, which means that the information in this article is not the latest information.

The position of this article is neutral and is supported by relevant sources. I looked at every source and they are all credible academic sources. The article layout is clean and the images blend well with the article, and the bolded font makes sense. It is a good article that can be trusted on Wikipedia.