User:Sugaryshae/Writing in childhood/Gaydoshbrucea1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?Assigned to: Sugaryshae


 * Link to draft you're reviewing Writing in childhood:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sugaryshae/Writing_in_childhood&action=edit:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) What does the article do well? impressed with? any turn of phrase in a clear way?
 * 2) The article outlines the stages well,  principles as well as other kinds of learning.like handwriting and influences and culture. The debate on patterns of writing and contemporary effects are parts of the article that are easy to understand.
 * 3) I like her additional subject categories which goes beyond the act of writing for the child.  She describes how to develop and encourage writing for this age.
 * 4) This article does not use extreme language.
 * 5) The warning at the top calls it an orphan with no other links attached.  It is stated to be written like a personal reflection making statements like, "creating texts is an important avenue for self-expression"...and "children who successfully advance...are better equipped to tackle..."
 * 6) What changes would be an improvement?
 * 7) Shae added content of: relationship between reading and writing; self-regulation, motor skills, and writing; promoting writing in early childhood.
 * 8) Shae added all academic journals to this article to help breakdown the understanding that writing in childhood involves more than the stages and principles.
 * 9) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 10) Most important thing is to add newer, more recent information to the lead as 2010 is most recent cited in the lead.  Throughout the body, 2016 is the most current of the sources.
 * 11) Shae added sources dated as recent July, 2023 to update this original article.
 * 12) Each of her paragraphs are balanced as far as structured with 1-2 paragraphs covering: Relationship to Reading, Self-Regulation, Motor skills, and writing, and Promoting Writing in Early Childhood.
 * 13) She has working sub-headings under for promoting writing which will match the neutral content, offering encouragement, providing diverse material, advocating inventive spelling (already formed), assisting with storytelling, sharing time, instructing children to give feedback.
 * 14) Shae can add live links to this orphan article to provide further resources for terms like "cognitive resources", "automaticity", and "Theory of Automaticity" and "overlapping processes".
 * 15) Did you notice anything that could be applicable to mine.
 * 16) My article could use the balanced coverage of numbered information like the stages and the principles listed with a short caption under.
 * 17) I also like the fact that she found sources from 2023 which shows current sources, thus, making this article stronger with notability.
 * 18) I need to add balance to my new categories.

Lead

easy to understand

clear structure

balanced coverage

neutral content

reliable sources

Content