User:SujitraN/Whitemargin unicornfish/SamuelCaballero94 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SujitraN


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SujitraN/Whitemargin_unicornfish?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Whitemargin unicornfish

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

1.) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)


 * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * The article has a good lead and a good description. It somewhat complements the existing article as the info he has stated relates. I am very impressed in the description he added, as it looks really good. The whole description described the species in a clear way
 * Thank you for the response, and I really do appreciate the comments made about my Wikipedia page, however, I am a she, not a he.

2.) Check the main points of the article:


 * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * The article does only discuss about the species and not the genus or family. The subtitles for the different sections are appropriate, however is missing data. The information under each section is also appropriate, but again, one section is missing data. The writing style and language of the article is also appropriate.
 * Thank you. I will be adding on information in the missing section after researching more about the species. And, to stay on topic with my species I didn't really want to add on anything about the genus or family to side track and just wanted to focus on just what I was assigned. But, I think adding 2-3 sentences about the family would add a little background story that can help.

3.) Check the sources:


 * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * What is the quality of the sources?
 * Each statement or sentence in the text is linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number, which is good. There is a reference list at the bottom of the page. Each of those sources are also linked with a little number. The quality of the sources are good as it differs from the ones from the main article.
 * Thank you, I will be adding future sources and will organize them in an MLA format so that it'll be easier to look for credits. And adding references to each of my future statements I'll be adding on.

4.) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):


 * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * I suggest to add more info in the Distribution & Habitat and the Human use & cultural significance sections. The article is not ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia as it is missing information to make it complete.
 * Thank you for the advice. I will for sure be adding those information in the section after researching properly. By adding these sections I think my articles would make much more sense and is ready for prime time.

5.) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

'''The most important thing the author could do to improve the article is to finish it up. Add more info in the sections and make it more descriptive. It is somewhat plain.'''

Thank you for your advice. I will add more details and finish up the sections. I do agree it is somewhat boring without the details, so my research will have to help me later on.

6.) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?

I noticed pictures in this article, that I could very well add into mines as well to make it look more presentable and to show my readers what my species looks like.

''I do agree on that as well. Pictures of the species's anatomy could even be added to add a slight information to help the readers as well!''