User:Sulaimankarim/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article: Health Policy
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Health policy
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * Health policy plays a crucial role in planning out and shaping the healthcare system. There is an important topic and not much has been written about it.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it directly relates to how healthcare systems are created and shaped.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * No recent events have been written about this topic.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * It is missing recent events and history

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * no - about 10 years out of date
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * no
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * It could be better

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * It seems some of the older sources came from think tanks and have since been replaced
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Start class and is part of the WikiProject Politics, Medicine, and Disability.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * It seems to be consistent with what we've learned in class

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * start class
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It covers a variety of topics and is neutral
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Needs a recent events and history component
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * less developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:

Evaluate an article: Health Education
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) : Health education
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * Health education plays a critical role in how healthy a population is. This is an important topic and not much has been written about it.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it relates to population health.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Somewhat - it does not include recent events or data
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * It is missing many things mentioned in the introduction and its relation to public health

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * no - there are no recent articles
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * yes, but there is only one
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * no
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * It could be better

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is some talk that there were some edits promoting their own occupation rather than providing information about the topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Start class and is part of the WikiProjects Medicine, Health and Fitness, and Education
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * It seems to be consistent with what we've learned in class

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * start class
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It covers a variety of topics and is neutral
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Needs a recent events and history component
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * less developed

Evaluate an article: Community Health Center
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) : Community health center
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * Community Health Centers aim to improve community health and play a pivotal role in helping low income communities.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it relates to population health globally and low income patients
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * It could improve with some history or policy

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * they're roughly 5-7 years old
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * yes, but there is only one
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * no
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * It could be better

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Very little talk except about external links
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Start class - WikiProject Hospitals and is of high importance
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * It seems to be consistent with what we've learned in class

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * start class
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It covers a variety of topics and is neutral
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Needs a recent events and history component
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * less developed