User:Sumeya333/Latin American social archaeology/Metomlinson Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Sumeya333
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Latin American social archaeology

Lead
The lead of this article has been updated to reflect more information about one of the two main archaeologists involved in Latin American Social Archaeology. I personally think that this information could be moved into its own section, and have the lead be more simply about what LASA is before diving in deeper about the main proponents of it.

Content
The content that was added to this article was relevant to the topic, as it was about one of the founders of Latin American Social Archaeology. The information is slightly dated to the 90s, but not terribly so. There is no missing content, though there is room to add more content. This article does deal with historically underrepresented populations, Latin America.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:

The tone is very neutral, and the claims do not appear to be heavily biased toward a particular position. Because this is a draft, I do not think that there are yet any viewpoints that are over or underrepresented at this point in time because they are still working on their content. The content does not attempt to persuade the reader to one position or another. Overall, really good in terms of tone and balance!

Sources and References
The content does seem to be cited from a reliable source, as it looks to be a journal article from a Latin American journal. I'm not able to really assess if the source is thorough, as it is in Spanish, and I do not speak/read Spanish, sorry! The source is a little dated, so I might suggest looking for some more current sources. There is only one source, but I believe that it is written by two Latin American women, and the links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:

The content is really easy to read and concise, and it does not contain any grammatical or spelling errors. There is only one section to date, so there is not much in terms of organization, understandably. I would recommend trying to flesh out a more substantial structure as you continue drafting, as I found that really helped me! :)

Images and Media
N/A. No images present.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:

I think that this is a really great start to improving this tiny article! The information added is a right step towards fleshing out the basic claims made in the original article. The strengths of the content so far are its neutrality of tone as well the fact that it is easy to read. My only suggestions would be to continue drafting, and seek out some more recent sources, but overall, really good for a first draft!