User:Sumit.iitp/Statement issues

This page contains a random sample of statements from Wikipedia articles that an algorithm has flagged as having issues. For a given statement below, review it and respond letting us know if it has the flagged issue. Leave a yes or no along with your notes on each statement. We will compare the responses with the predictions our model has generated to determine its effectiveness and share the results with the community.

Sign up
Add your username here to get updates on the project and be pinged about future iterations.
 * User:Sumit.iitp
 * EpochFail (talk &bull; contribs)
 * Your signature

Point of View (POV issues)
For each statement below, let us know if it has a POV issue or not.

Statements
Review more POV statements
 * 1) Morning sleep inertia takes two to four hours to dissipate completely, though we may function adequately before that time. (revision)
 * No. Not a POV issue here. It might be a citation-needed --EpochFail  (talk &bull; contribs) 18:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes improper voice is used. Wikipedia should be written in third person (t &#183; c)  buidhe  12:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) The workers, however, were not forced; rather they chose to work the overtime, albeit by dire economical necessity. (revision)
 * Yes. Unless the workers were surveyed and reported their choices that is at least OR and it pushes a POV. --EpochFail (talk &bull; contribs) 18:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Depends Possibly an OR or POV issue, depending on what the source says and how authoritative it is. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  12:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) The rare surviving pieces of Nantgarw porcelain are considered today to be among the most valuable artefacts ever produced in Wales, and are among the most exquisite examples of British Porcelain ever made. (revision)
 * Yes.(ish), it definitely needs a "who?" template after "most valuable artefacts ever produced in Wales". If an RS says that, and there's reference, I'd have no problem with it.  Red Fiona (talk) 09:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) Frustrated by the lack of radio airplay received by previous Wilco albums, the band decided to branch out into television advertising. (revision)
 * No, because the opinion is attributed to the band. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) Within a few decades of Christopher Columbus's landing on the coast of what is now Venezuela in 1498, South America had been effectively conquered by Spain and Portugal. (revision)
 * No issue with this (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~

Discussion
Put any of your general thought about our POV issue detection here --EpochFail (talk &bull; contribs) 00:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Clarity (CLARIFY issues)
For each statement below, let us know if it needs clarification (WP:CLARIFY).

Statements

 * 1) Badgworthy Water is one of the small rivers running north to the coast and is associated with the Lorna Doone legends.  (revision)
 * No. The link to Lorna Doone means I can find out what that means without repetition across multiple pages.  Red Fiona (talk) 09:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt>The success of 1997's Good Will Hunting, which Affleck co-wrote and acted in, marked a turning point in his career.</tt> (revision)
 * No. Red Fiona (talk) 09:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt>The washbacks that Glen Scotia had were more than 40 Years Old and were made out of Corton Steel. </tt> (revision)
 * Yes., but could be fixed with a link to washbacks. Red Fiona (talk) 09:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt>Its annual meetings are held alternately in San Diego, California in even-numbered years, and in Washington, D.C., in odd-numbered years.</tt>  (revision)
 * No. Red Fiona (talk) 09:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt> He was appointed on 30 September 1886, succeeding Francis Flemming, and held the office until 1892. </tt> (revision)
 * No. Red Fiona (talk) 09:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your assessment here ~

Review more CLARIFY statements

Citation needed
For each statement below, let us know if it needs a citation.

Statements
Review more statements in need of citation
 * 1) <tt>Hayle parish was created in 1888 from part of the now defunct Phillack parish, with which it was later combined in 1935, and incorporated part of St Erth in 1937.</tt> ("Lead" section) (revision)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt>Eastward, a difficult mountain route led to Guiyang in Guizhou province and thence to Hunan province.</tt> ("Sustainable_development" section)(revision)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt>In 2004, Willow Island hosted the fifth year of the ESPN Great Outdoor Games, which feature athletes competing in outdoor activities including fishing, sporting dog events, target shooting, and timber events.</tt> ("Willow_Island" section) (revision)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) <tt>A commander of one of the sections of the Polish front during the Siege of Warsaw of 1939, after the war he became one of the most renowned historians documenting the history of the Invasion of Poland.</tt> ("LEAD" section) (revision)
 * Your assessment here ~
 * 1) Palm's Tungsten E was the cheapest of the Tungsten series, and as such, has been one of the most successful .. ("Models" section)  (revision)
 * Your assessment here ~

Discussion

 * It all depends on where in the article the statement is: if followed by another sentence with citation it is not an issue; ditto if in the lead of the article (MOS:LEADCITE, not required.) I doubt that AI helps with this problem. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

What is this for?
We (User:Sumit.iitp and User:EpochFail) are developing algorithmic strategies to help editors identify issues in articles. We're getting close to a method that we think works pretty well. We need your help to evaluate how close we are getting. We need your insights about what the algorithm is catching/missing in order to make sure we're on the right track and to make sure it is useful.