User:SunRey451/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
National Gallery of Art

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the National Gallery of Art has an art library within it, but there is no mention of this on the wikipedia page.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: The lead is a little wordy, but provides a brief description. It probably doesn't need to include a thorough background in this section. Also, it could use more citations because there is only one citation.

Content: There is a heavy focus on the architecture of the building and not a lot on the history or current operations. The operations subheading is especially lacking and could be where information on the library is included.

Tone: The article is neutral.

Sources: There are several dead links, but not many. Additionally, the sources that have been cited are very reliable. There may be a little to many links to the National Gallery itself though.

Organization: I think it is organized appropriately, but it does not provide enough space for operations. It is also easy to read and understand.

Images: The images go well with the page and are relevant to the information.

Talk page: The talk page is not busy and there are only a handful of posts. Many of the questions have not been dealt with. Most of the conversations are very old.

Impressions: This page needs to be updated and needs more citations. More information on operations is also required including the addition of the art library.