User:SunflowerLover20

About me
I am a student and vocal singer who lives in North America. Graduated from high school, I study medical science in the community college. I sing in the choir, and I am interested in performing in public. My hobbies are traveling and learning foreign languages. Speaking different languages allows people to travel comfortably around the world connecting with the local people and giving you more experience. Other than traveling, I enjoy practicing for marathons, going on hikes, and planning for the next adventure with the parents and siblings.

My Wikipedia interests
I often found many of the information I need from Wikipedia. Being grateful for that, I was thinking in writing some other data to the website. If I am working for Wikipedia in the future, I will probably make small changes to pages and correct any flaws, particularly in the interest of grammatical errors. Also, since my major is a medical assistant, I want to collect some more information about health and medicine. It will be an honor for me to post some information people can use.

Article Evaluation
Having a sister who is going to enter a high school this year, I was recently interested in finding more information about the schools in Snohomish county. I found one public high school called Marysville Getchell. Due to the popularity of the school, I visited the Marysville Getchell High School article on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: its lack of citation, its renovate, and its inactive links."

Renovate
The information I looked up is up-to-date and the page is even edited last month. However, the citations are not as current as possible. Ten years passed since the school was founded, according to the article, and the citations are not updated in the information from the 2013 year. No wonder if some events have changed and the content is already not so true.

Inactive Links
Even though the article includes some references, many of the links in the bottom are not activated. Whether the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose can make readers confused. Hence, it is much more harder for the reader to verify the reference material, find related content, or answer a call to action when the author has given the readers something to click on. Additionally, by not seeing the actual referenced pages, the reader might doubt the veracity of the information.

Summary
In general, I evaluate the article as "well" written but not completely extended. The article itself is neutral and there is no presence of heavily biased claims or language. In addition, there are no grammatical errors or informal language. Yet the page does not include all the necessary citations for readers to understand the content and be sure of the reliability of the information. Also, not up-to-dating citations toward the article are not the best way to attract visitors to continue reviewing the page. I would recommend the author to update the citation information due to the chance of its changing. Finally, because of the "dead" reference links provided on the page, it would be better to make repairs there, to ensure the readers of the reliability of the information.