User:Sunflower candy/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Natsuo Kirino
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Our teacher gave us this articles to evaluate in the class.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No. It's too short rather than detailed.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Some are reliable but others are uncertain
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Some are available but others are not
 * Are the sources current? No. Even the latest article was published in 2013, and most articles were published in 2000s.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? No. For example, Fleming, Michael (2004-06-29). "New Line thrills to 'Out' with Nakata."

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No. Most parts don't have enough information. Also, this article doesn't have enough references.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? I don't think so
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? No
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are conversations about translations of some titles from Japanese to English and about links or references.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes. It's a part of WikiProjiects, and this article is evaluated as C~B class by 3 types of WikiProjects..
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? B
 * What are the article's strengths? Using many in-text citations
 * How can the article be improved? By adding new information, creating more organized lead part and using more resources.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I think this article is undeveloped because the article is a little bit short, especially the lead part. In addition, there are not enough references, so editors should add some new reliable information.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: