User:Sunggyunglee/Metabolic flux analysis/Cafe1919 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sunggyunglee


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Sunggyunglee/Metabolic flux analysis - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Metabolic flux analysis - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead has been concisely updated to reflect the new content added. The new content is concise, neutral, and relevant. The citation links work and they support the claims in the article, but some of the citations need to be manually fixed to have the correct date. A citation could be added to the first sentence of "Isotopically Non-stationary Metabolic Flux Analysis".

I like how each method has its own section, making the distinction very clear. There are no overrepresented or underrepresented viewpoints. Within each method, the content is relevant and concise. I especially like how the user goes into the potential applications for each method.

Overall, this was a very well written article.