User:Sunita George/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
RNA world - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Because of recent advances in the field of RNA, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic and the discovery of mRNA vaccines, learning about the origin and basic concept of RNA would be a good place to start in order to better comprehend and appreciate the usage of RNA in current therapies. This article was chosen because it seems to cover a wide range of concepts while still being simple to grasp. As a result, evaluating such an article would assist others in swiftly grasping the fundamentals.

Evaluate the article
The lead section provides a brief introduction without going into excessive depth or presenting material that is not relevant to the topic. However, it lacks a description of the important portions of the article. The text is extremely thorough with some information that has been repeated leaving the reader with the feeling of monotony. Few sections of the article’s content were partially relevant to the topic however the content was up to date with references from the recent past. As mentioned earlier, few topics could’ve been omitted as they felt misplaced with respect to the topic.

The article has a neutral connotation. The incorporation of thoughts and alternative hypotheses from all perspectives shows that the article was not written with a biased view. Upon verification, the references added by the writer can be backed up by a reliable secondary source of information however, most of the references indicate that the information has been obtained from old research papers and patents.

The article was well organized and was catered to make the reader easily navigate through sections which increased the readability of the content. The content was clear with no grammatical errors but not concise in few areas. The inclusion of visuals and figures aids the reader in grasping the concept more quickly, yet more images could be included given the topic's range. There aren't many debates or discussions on the Talk page about the topic's representation. It has a C rating with more opportunity for improvement.

Overall, the article was well written with a wealth of helpful and relevant information. The only point of concern would be the amount of additional content which had a tendency to steer away from the topic. The strong point of this article is the way of writing which was made exclusively for readers to easily navigate their way through topics and subtopics however, the number of images were very limited.