User:Sunshine8899/Structural chemistry/Bird flock Peer Review

General info
Sunshine8899 and Huberyshen
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sunshine8899/Structural chemistry
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Structural chemistry

Evaluate the drafted changes
Pros: Very very well researched. incredible.

-just lots of sources everywhere, good job.

The structure of having bullet points into explaining each bullet point more is genius. I'm gonna use that for our article.

Very neutral artice. Excellent for wikipedia.

The images add to the work well with good captions.

Cons: Lead could be developed more. A longer paragraph to introduce structural chemistry with a wider overview of the concepts could help introduce the readers more.

-the points in the importance section could be more developed. The slight look into each application helps a little, but it could be good to relate more how structural chemistry helps (IE what techniques are used for analyzing catalysis).

-Some sentences could be more concise and the article needs a careful look for where paragraphs could be more concise

Overall: an incredibly well made article. I learned a lot from looking at your work!