User:Sunshine8899/Structural chemistry/Mxmansa Peer Review

General info
Sunshine8899
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sunshine8899/Structural chemistry
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Structural chemistry

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead has been edited by my peer to remove some of the information and incorporate it into the body of the article instead. It includes a strong introductory sentence that gives a brief description about the contents of the article. However, it the lead mentions general laws and the derivation of general rules which are not discussed in the body. It is concise and not overly-detailed.

Content:

The content added is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date with information from up to 2023. There is no missing information and it also mentions the underrepresented topic of Green Chemistry.

Tone and balance:

Neutrally written. Well done!

Sources and References:

All of the content under the heading "Importance and Contributions of Structural Chemistry" requires citations. There are minimal sources, which makes the page seem less reliable. For the references that are included, the source authors are diverse and the links work.

Organization:

I think this page is very well organized. I appreciate how all of the determination methods are introduced and then split-up to be discussed individually.

Images:

Needs images.

Overall impressions:

Huge improvement from the original page! I also like that you added challenges and future applications related to the topic. If you back this information up with some sources and images, I believe it would be complete. Good job.