User:SunshineANDSmile/Peet's Coffee/Bananannah02 Peer Review

General info
SunshineANDSmile / Peet's Coffee
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:SunshineANDSmile/Peet's Coffee
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:SunshineANDSmile/Peet's Coffee

Evaluate the drafted changes
Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions


 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

I feel like everything in the article was relevant to the article topic. I don’t think that the person led into talking about anything else besides the company and how it impacts climate change. The only thing that really “distracted” me was not really understanding how exactly they are helping the environment through the usage of trees, even though it isn’t as harsh as burning fossil fuels, expanding more on the idea behind why using trees is better.

2. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article seems pretty neutral overall, no opinions or claims it seems. A little bit of bias towards Peet’s being a good coffee production company just because of the lack of what it has done to impact the environment.

3. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

There isn’t talk about how Peet’s has impacted the environment, rather what they will do to improve the impact. I think adding what they’ve done or what coffee production in general has done to impact the environment and going in on how Peet’s specifically has would be important to add.

4. Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

All of the links for the citations work and support the claims in the article well.

5. Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Each fact is indeed supported by an appropriate, reliable reference. Each of the references are from either Peet’s site or scholarly, peer-reviewed articles that discuss what was said in the article. I don’t believe the sources themselves are biased but rather they aren’t discussing how Peet’s company has already impacted the environment.

6. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

The information is not out of date. As I said previously, just making sure to discuss more on any damages Peet’s company had already done to the environment but also more importation on what Peet’s company actually does, I think more of an introduction on the company itself could be beneficial.