User:SuperSenior/sandbox

Article Evaluation (Human Resources Management Association of Chicago.) 1. Everything for the most part is relevant. I found some stuff that could have been left out as it easily could make the reader want to leave the page. 2.It appears neutral. I did not find anything that would make me think it is biased towards the Association. 3. All viewpoints appear to be equal. Nothing it underrepresented or over-represented. 4. A lot of the references seem to come from News Paper articles that do not have link. It does however have one to the organizations website and the video to the Association's 90th Anniversary celebration. The information pulled from those two citations work and support the wiki article. 5. The sources can seem a little biased just because any organization can talk themselves up and promote themselves 6. It needs to be more updated as far as current events. In 2018 they have a presentation on sexual harassment in the workplace. I feel as though that should be added because its a relevant and important topic. Last event that was included in the timeline was 2005 and it says it was last updated in 2016. 7. The last time the talk was used was in 2012. It says the article is managed by WikiProjectChicago. 8. It is part of the WikiProjectChicago. 9. It goes into the Timeline. It does not go into a paragraph format like typical Wikipedia articles do.