User:SuperSwift/sandbox1

{| style="width: 100%; background: #EBF0FF; border: 1px solid blue;"
 * style="vertical-align: top; width: 75%; padding: .5em;" |
 * style="vertical-align: top; width: 75%; padding: .5em;" |

Welcome to Women in Red (WiR)! We are a group of editors of all genders living around the world focused on improving content systemic bias in the wiki movement. We recognized a need for this work as, in October 2014, only 15.53% of English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. Founded in July 2015, WiR strives to increase the percentage, which has reached 18.39% as of 5 May 2020. But that means, according to WHGI, only 314,089 of our 1,708,248 biographies are about women. Not impressed? "Content gender gap" is a form of systemic bias, and WiR addresses it in a positive way through shared values.

There are more than 18,000 general forum comments on our talkpage. You don't have to be a member in order to participate in the conversations, just please be civil.

Wikipedia

Our Wikipedia WikiProject focuses on creating content regarding women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues. Our editors create articles in many different language Wikipedias. The objective is to turn "redlinks" into blue ones. That's why we are called "Women in Red".

We take an inclusive view towards subject matter, editors, and language communities:
 * Editors: We do not focus on the gender of the editor. Anyone/everyone is welcome to be a member, participant, enthusiast of Women in Red. If you participate in WiR, you can join up officially using the box in the top right-hand corner of this page. You are also welcome to add our userbox template to your user page, to produce:
 * Language communities: While Women in Red began on English Wikipedia, it is an international commitment with dozens of other language communities. Please add a link to your language's coordination page here.
 * Subject matter:
 * If the subject of the article self-identifies as a woman—binary and/or non-binary and/or other, that person is included within the scope of Women in Red.
 * In addition to creating new articles, we create and maintain hundreds of lists of "missing" notable women. Some who these women have an article on some language Wikipedia, while others have no article in any Wikipedia. We call these lists, "redlists".
 * Click on our Redlinks index to see our lists of missing articles by focus area, occupation and nationality. Like everything else on Wikipedia, this is incomplete, so feel free to add pertinent items to our crowd-sourced lists.
 * While all redlists have redlinks, our redlists are generated in numerous ways:
 * crowd-sourced (example, Crafts)
 * Wikidata-generated (example, Herpetologists)
 * based on a dictionary or other reference book (example, Encyclopédie Larousse)
 * based on a website (example, BBC 100 Women)
 * based on an international Authority Control (example, VIAF)

WikiCommons

In support of #VisibleWikiWomen, our members add and improve images of women, women's works, and women's issues to WikiCommons.

Wikidata

We create and improve Wikidata items related to women, women's works, and women's issues.

See also

Learn more about our work, including Press and Research.

Lists of red links
WiR works by filling in missing articles based on extensive lists of needed topics. The index to our wide range of topics and nationalities can be found at the  Redlist index. Please make these red links blue. Notable women without a Wikipedia biography can be added to any crowd-sourced redlists they match; and added to wikidata such that they're included in wikidata-derived redlists. We also have a guide to adding names to redlists.

Article alerts

 * See WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women for articles about women that are nominated for deletion.

Declined drafts
Thanks firstly to, and now to , we have a bot showing declined drafts submitted to AfC. Weekly updates highlight those most recently listed under New Additions. With a little bit of attention, some of them could well be moved to mainspace, encouraging the editors who created them to progress on Wikipedia.

Resources and research
WiR maintains resources to help you contribute, including lists of topical books and external links, information on editing in general, and contacts you can reach out to for specific needs. They can be found at Resources.

Academic research on Wikipedia's content gender gap is also documented at Research.

Metrics

 * This section is a transcluded subpage, containing more information than is shown here. To view detailed month-by-month results or to edit, go to Metrics.

Showcase
WiR is amazing and has way too much to showcase here. Please see Showcase for our recent and past achievements.

Recent Did You Know? blurbs
These are the 20 most recent WP:DYK entries for WiR. Updated approximately weekly by User:JL-Bot.

Press
There has been considerable press coverage of WiR. Below are some recent articles. To add articles to the list, visit Press.

Academia
Academic papers on gender bias in Wikipedia (as recorded in Wikidata) are listed in Scholia.

To include a paper, create an item about it on Wikidata (check first to avoid duplicates) and give it =.