User:Surfer616147/2001 southern Peru earthquake/2003la Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Surfer616147/2001 southern Peru earthquake


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Surfer616147/2001_southern_Peru_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 2001 southern Peru earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article evaluation seems pretty short, I feel like they could have added more details such as if there were enough images in the article, with a good enough description, or if the different sections were well put together and if the article ran smoothly. The article draft does seem pretty good to me, there is a lot of new information. I was confused on the references, because there were a lot of links that weren’t under the references. The article that they choose was a little short, and only included one picture, so one thing that could be added is adding more pictures and description. They can add sections such as the history, aftermath or environmental changes. I liked how in your article contribution, you added sections talking about tsunami which is not mentioned in the article. Overall, I like how organized your article contribution is, maybe adding one or two more sections could be helpful, but overall it is looking good.

Andrew Response:
Thank you for the input. I will attempt to adjust my groups article accordingly in order to improve upon it. Also in response to your question about the references/sources, we have not linked/organized all of them yet as we simply imputed references for later use due to certain constraints + brainstorming.