User:Surfer616147/2001 southern Peru earthquake/Dirtyterp Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

2001 Southern Peru


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Surfer616147/2001 southern Peru earthquake


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 2001 southern Peru earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
The ideas and concepts presented seem like they can be important to the article and definitely relevant topics. I like the information added on tsunamis seeing how there was not a section for it and is something that is a important factor of any earthquake. The tectonic setting section is also relevant and important to understanding the origin of the earthquake. I do feel like there can be more information added to the "earthquake" section seeing how there is very little information in the section. The tectonic section and the earthquake section could even be combined in a sense that they go hand and hand and could relate on similar topics. Overall the sections that are being worked on are very well written and could be key to understanding the earthquake and how it originated and what followed.

Sarah's Response
Thank you for your positive review of the new tsunami section. I agree that the tectonic and earthquake sections need to be expanded upon. We have not fully looked into the tectonic setting of the area, but we were planning on finding more about the physical characteristics of the setting as well as any important history about activity in the same area. If we cannot find enough information on the tectonic setting then it may be a good decision to combine the earthquake section with the tectonic setting section. Overall we plan to add more to the article as well as organize and reference our sources.