User:Surfer616147/2001 southern Peru earthquake/Ssathien Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Surfer616147, Smf7462, Zafir Alolade


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Surfer616147/2001_southern_Peru_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 2001 southern Peru earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article looks well-written and factual, with not evident bias. However, I would like to see more details of the earthquake. I do like how you give some context by talking about the tsunami that formed by the earthquake. Your bibliography is good and reliable with a variety of sources. You just need to organize them into references. Additionally, the wording of the article are a bit convoluted. I suggest cutting out and combining some sentences to the make article flow better.

Sarah's Response
Thank you for the nice evaluation of the article, its sources, and the tsunami section. We plan on using the bibliography to create references and in text citations, that will be done once we finish editing the section itself. I appreciate the comment about the wording of the article and will review and revise it. We plan on adding more to the article in general but most importantly in the earthquake and tectonic setting sections.