User:Surferr03/Constance white/Plutocash55 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Surferr03


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Surferr03/Constance_white?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

No lead was provided for this draft. The topic is relevant and up to date with its content, expansion of more content is needed but the content provided is definitely relevant. The content is also completely neutral, The content is backed up by its sources, the content does reflect directly to its sources. The sources are current. I wasn't able to find "better" sources for this draft. The content is well written, in all aspects of conventional academic writing. Links provided so far, do work. No images provided yet for this draft. The list of sources must be detailed further, more links need to be provided in the article so it can connect to other articles. The strength of the content added is definitely its body, clear and concise. Content so far doesn't show signs of needing improvement, but expansion of content needs to be provided.