User:Surferr03/Louise Thompson Patterson/Plutocash55 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Surferr03


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Surferr03/Louise_Thompson_Patterson?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead does have an introductory sentence that describes what the article will be based on. The lead is concise and does include a brief description of the article, all information included in the lead is further elaborated in the body of the draft. The content provided is relevant and up to date. The content provided is sufficient and no information is considered "missing" from this draft. The content provided is very neutral. The sources are very reliable and are thorough, the sources on current and no sources were found that can be deemed "better". Links provided in the draft do work. Content in drafts is well-organized, concise and well written. No images provided yet for this article. List of sources is extensive. Content can be expanded but overall content does provide exceptional information regarding the topic.