User:Sustainabledevelopmentstudent/Watts Rising/Taylorherm Peer Review

General info
susutainabledevelopmentstudent
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sustainabledevelopmentstudent/Watts Rising
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The lead includes an introductory sentence that sets the tone for the article. It gives a brief overview of Watts within Las Angeles.
 * The lead does not explicitly outline the article's major sections (e.g., The Mission and Purpose, Methods, Organizations Involved, Progress Report). It provides a summary of Watts Rising's goals but doesn't detail the structure of the content that follows, such as specific initiatives, methods, or organizations involved.
 * The information in the article is all stated in the lead and there seems to be no information provided that is not mentioned within the lead.
 * It is concise and introduces Watts, summarizing the purpose and goal.
 * The content provided is relevant to the main topic of the Watts Rising initiative, covering various aspects of the project. It includes the purpose, methods, organizations, and a progress report.
 * The information is up to date and even mentions a progress report with timely information. There are references that lead up to March 2024, indicating that the article has recent information that is relevant to the topic.
 * I believe that all of the content is well-aligned to the topic. It might be beneficial to add information regarding long-term goals beyond the projects that are currently happening to set the information into context.
 * The topic highlights an underrepresented population, the Watts community in Las Angeles. This is in line with Wikipedia’s equity gaps because Watts struggles with poverty, unemployment, social and environmental injustices. It reduces the equity gap on Wikipedia by providing accurate information of the Watts Rising initiative.
 * The content is neural and describes the objectives, methods, organizations, and progress of the Watts Rising project without using language that favors any particular viewpoint. The information is provided in a factual way.
 * I do not see any viewpoints that are particularly biased toward a particular position. The content focuses on the perspective of the Watts Rising initiative and its impact within the community.
 * As mentioned before, I did not see any viewpoints that are over or underrepresented. The article is very objective.
 * The content, again, does not attempt to persuade the reader towards a specific position. It is very neutral and just describes the efforts and achievements of the project.
 * I believe that most of the information provided is backed up by a reliable source of information. However, I do think that there could be more backup and support from sources. Considering finding more sources to cite.


 * Consider adding more sources to your article to fully back up your information. Also, consider condensing your information; your paragraphs are quite extensive. I enjoyed your use of images.