User:Sustainavaleity/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Audrey Stevens Niyogi - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate
I chose this article because Dev Niyogi is an important figure in my life, and I know how much his mother means to him. One of my first memories of his classes is him showing off his mother's Wikipedia page, showing off how impactful she was to the scientific community. I periodically come back to this article.

Evaluate the article
The leading section of the article is concise. Although it seems very short in comparison to some other articles, Dr. Stevens Niyogi's page as a whole is fairly brief so the one-sentence lead is appropriate.

Content is well-organized and relevant to Dr. Stevens Niyogi. It gives a brief overview of her life pre-academia, gives a good description of her work in biochemistry, what colleges she taught at, and her personal life during and after academia. After reading, I feel that I've gotten as much information as I'd need to be able to talk about Dr. Stevens Niyogi in a fair amount of detail. Almost every single sentence has a link to a reference. Unfortunately, a couple of these no longer display the proper information. Much of the references link to scientific articles that are behind a paywall. A couple of references are even directly from the personal webpages of her sons.

Images linked to Dr. Stevens Niyogi are done well, too. She has a photo of her as a child with her family and another where she is at home in Oak Ridge. She has been well humanized, and the photos seem good quality for seemingly being older.

The talk page is mostly empty. There seemed to just be one conversation way back in 2015 which was a result of a technical miscommunication of some sorts.

I think overall, this article is really good for someone who is classified as "low-importance" by Wikipedia. There's enough detail to get a good picture of Dr. Stevens Niyogi's life. Unless someone publishes a biography of her, I don't think we could get much better than what we have right now. I kind of wish Wikipedia had some sort of 'trivia' section that many fandom wiki's have. I think it would be useful to throw in miscellaneous information about people, events, and such.