User:Sv290/Ovarian cancer/Dehydrogenase Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sv290


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Ovarian cancer
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ovarian cancer

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead has a great introductory sentence that is clear and concise. There is plenty of detail in this section and it is easy to read, but it lacks a description of the article's major sections. This section only includes information that is present elsewhere in the article.

Content: The content of the article is relevant and up to date, with plenty of references added. All information contained within the article is relevant to the topic.

Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is neutral and nonbiased, without intention to sway the user one way or the other. No specific viewpoints are represented more heavily than others.

Sources and References: The added sources are recent and thorough, and were taken from reliable journals/books. No sources were used from historically marginalized groups, which could be a nice addition. The links work and the sources added are from high quality secondary sources.

Organization: The content added is clear, concise, and easy to read. The article is well organized with appropriate subheadings and the article does not have any spelling mistakes that I noticed.

Images and Media: The images in the article are clear and help the reader understand the topic. The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations, are laid out well, and contain appropriate captions. The article could be improved with a couple more pictures.

Overall Impressions: Overall, the article looks great! There is an appropriate level of detail and the sources were well chosen and reflect up to date knowledge of the topic. The article was improved by the content added, especially with the addition of several well chosen references. The article could be improved through the addition of a couple more photos.