User:Swanson04/Personal web page/Linus Robideau Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Swanson04


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Swanson04/Personal web page


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Personal web page

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think your draft would be a great addition to the article and checks off all the boxes on the peer review checklist. Everything you wrote is relevant to the article topic and there are no distractors. The addition doesn't show any sort of bias so it is neutral. There are no over or underrepresented viewpoints, each sentence acts as a quick summary that presents new information about personal web pages. All of the links work and all of the claims are supported by unbiased, reliable sources. All of the information appears to be up to date. The only critique I have is on the sentence about Madden's research. I was able to find out who Madden was by looking at the source but every reader might not do the same, leading to confusion about where the name is coming from. I think a quick sentence about who Madden is and what their research is about would be helpful or just taking Madden's name out and leaving it at "research found...". Overall, I think the addition is very informative and will help improve the quality of the article.