User:Swanson24/Wadjet/Meegleague Peer Review

General info
Swanson24
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Swanson24/Wadjet
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Wadjet

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

-This is kind of nitpicky, but I would maybe make sure your section headers (like "Wadjet's Greek influence", for example) are bolded/made bigger/differentiated from paragraph text in some way. Just makes it flow better visually!

-In the "History" section I would maybe add more citations! There seems to be large chunks of info seemingly uncited, but it's all good info if you could find/add citations for it!

Content

-Really good! Nothing off here, it all feels neutral and balanced, etc etc

Organization

-Very well organized! The only thing I would change is what I mentioned before with the bolding of the section titles within your article just for the sake of visually differing.

Tone/Balance

-Really solid! It's obviously hard to tell without context, but at least from an outside perspective this feels very balanced and neutral.

Sources

-Just one thing to be aware of, I'm not sure your in text citations were linked properly, really easy to fix, you just click the little quotation marks at the top of the page!