User:Swashecka/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
World War II

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I've always been interested in World War II and I wanted to evaluate an article on a topic that I felt invested in.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is concise and introduces the key points that are contained in the article. It includes an introductory sentence that summarizes and defines what the article is about. The article's content is relevant and up-to-date. It does not appear that the article is missing any information, or that there are any gaps in the research. However, it does not seem to include historically underrepresented populations as one of the main topics. The article is neutral and there are no points in which it comes off as biased for or against any topics. It never attempts to persuade the reader in favor of or against any position.

Facts within the article are backed up by different sources, which are up-to-date and thorough. It appears that there is a relatively diverse selection of authors that are cited. The links within this article that I have checked work. The article is well written and organized, since it is easy to read and sectioned in a successful manner. There were no spelling or grammar errors that I came across. The article has many images that contribute to the overall organization and understanding of the topics presented. The images are captioned well and follow Wikipedia's citation policies. The images are presented and organized in a way that visually enhances the topics of the article. There are a few discussions within the talk page, many of which relatign to the order that Stalin and Roosevelt should be presented in. It is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's assessment scale, and is part of multiple WikiProjects. The article has many strengths, such as its overall organization, its well written nature, and the broad span of information that it covers. Overall, the article is well developed.