User:Sweepsweepmop/Greek Drachma/Pagelliad Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sweepsweepmop


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sweepsweepmop/Greek Drachma


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Greek drachma

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi!

Good work on such a well-established and researched article. I think your choice of the sections to edit and the sections to leave alone made a lot of sense.

1) I think your choice to leave the lead alone was valid, as it is already complete and thorough.

2) Your additional headings were helpful to me as a reader to understand and break up the article. The organization became more clear and made the information more digestible.3) I think each section is talked about an appropriate amount in regard to their importance. Your idea to add a map to the geographic spread part is good, that could be helpful. I also think talking about dowries could be an excellent idea. I know there is a plethora of pictures of coins on the standing page right now, but maybe another kind of visual could be useful. Like a coin purse or something along those lines.

4) Everything is very informational and the article avoids voicing opinions about anything.

5) Very nice bibliography with a wide range of citations, and good formatting as well.