User:Swimmer2424/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Teach For America

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I wanted to learn more about Teach For America in general and this article gave a good overview about the program. There were many different subtopics as well, which looked extremely helpful. This article is informative about basic information about Teach For America. After previewing the article, it looked secure and reliable. There was a lot of information and it seemed to be up to date. Overall, I wanted to learn about the program and this article looked useful.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article is extremely informative and there is a lot of content. It all is relevant to the topic of Teach For America. It is organized and easy to read, and there are no notable grammatical or spelling errors. There are many different subtopics including history, geographical area, and the growth of the program. The content is also up to date, as it dates back about ten to fifteen years and the sources are also reliable and up to date. The links also work, which is important to note. There are a few smaller pictures on the article as well. They fit in well with the article and do not take away from the key points. The pictures are also properly captioned, which is important. However, there is a criticisms section which can make the article no longer neutral. In the "Talk" section, it is noted that a criticisms portion should not have been included. Overall, it is a decent article that is helpful for learning more about Teach For America.