User:Sxndrx2828/Psychology/Inferior12 Peer Review

General info

 * The article's introduction was greatly extended and more information regarding the history of psychology was incorporated in the lead section that you supplied. Below is a summary of the assessment using the given criteria: Lead:
 * You updated the lead section to reflect the new content added. However, you might consider a minor revision to make it flow more smoothly.
 * The introductory sentence in the lead section provides a concise and clear description of the article's topic.
 * The lead is informative, but it's somewhat lengthy. It might benefit from a bit of conciseness without losing essential details. Content:
 * The content added is highly relevant to the topic and expands upon the historical aspects of psychology.
 * The article now addresses the historical aspects of psychology, which is relevant to the field's development and its historical context. It doesn't seem to address specific equity gaps or underrepresented populations directly, but it provides valuable historical context. Tone and Balance:
 * The tone of the content added is neutral and not biased.
 * The content doesn't appear to favor one viewpoint over another and maintains an objective tone.
 * The article seems to maintain a balanced view of the topic without overrepresenting or underrepresenting viewpoints. Sources and References:
 * The content added includes citations from reliable secondary sources, which is essential.
 * It's important to ensure that the content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. I can't evaluate this without access to the specific sources. Organization:
 * The content you added is well-written, concise, and clear.
 * I didn't notice any obvious grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The content added follows a logical flow in the article and is well-organized. Images and Media:
 * You didn't add images or media, so there's no evaluation needed in this regard. Overall Impressions:
 * The content you added significantly improved the article by providing more historical context for psychology. The lead section is informative and sets the stage for what the article will cover.
 * The strengths of the content include its relevance, neutrality, and good organization.
 * To further improve the content, it's essential to ensure that it accurately reflects the sources, but this would require direct access to those sources. Overall, it's a valuable addition to the article, and with minor revisions, it can enhance the article even further. Great work!



Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)