User:Sxndrx2828/Psychology/Mirmir77 Peer Review

The large introduction is very necessary for the article, as it clearly states the topic and the necessary details associated with the topic. I do believe there are sentences in the intro that can be shortened and/or combined. The topic the article is covering is very broad, so the highly detailed introduction is great. The content of the article very abundant and provides the reader with topics ranging from the history of the topic to modern practices. The sources used to support are very strong and the bibliography is very nuanced. Furthermore, there are certain times in the article where it dives very deep into aspects of psychology that may not be necessary. Shortening or summing up the sections may help with the overall look of the article and may help with distribution of images and diagrams. To add, the diagrams and pictures are well placed, but there are some large sections of text that could use an image. Given the depth of the topic the article is covering, the organization of the article is structured and has detailed subheadings under the main ones. The reader shouldn't get lost or feel overwhelmed at all due to the nice flow from heading to heading in the article. Again, there are pieces that can be summed up and can contribute to the presentation of the article.

General info
Sxndrx2828
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)