User:Sydanne7/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Paranoid personality disorder

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is an interesting topic and it seemed like some sections were short, and needed assistance. This article is on a very important topic and the subject needs to be elaborated since it has not been edited much in awhile. My first impression was that the article seemed unfinished, yet has good information. Expansion just needs to happen.

Evaluate the article

 * This article consists of good writing, and good organization. It could just use improvement in the areas of expanding some parts, checking some language usage, and updating research with newer sources.
 * The lead section could include a larger description of what is going to be mentioned later in the article. It does not mention anything about causes, treatment, or history about Paranoid personality disorder.
 * The article has only been edited a handful of times this year and could use updating.
 * Cause section could be expounded. Sentence about the Norwegian twin study is a bit unclear. Maybe make a section based on past studies surrounding the subject.
 * Epidemiology section could also be lengthened. (telling more about age and frequency of the disorder)
 * Maybe include a couple more sections such as a section on Management which could give information on how this disorder can be handled (More about medication and intervention). Also maybe a section expanding about the onset of this disorder and how it changes over time.
 * Under Differential Diagnosis, the wording should be changed from "The paranoid".
 * Article does not include any images or visual aids to further understanding of the topic. (Maybe include graphics that visualize where and how prevalent this disorder is)
 * Some references that are cited are outdated (published before 2000).
 * Overall, it is a C-Class article that could use some adjustments to make it even better!