User:SydneyEGrace/Astrobrachion adhaerens/Susennac Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Reaformarinebio, SydneyEGrace


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Astrobrachion adhaerens


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Astrobrachion adhaerens (same as the link above as of 04/08/21)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

Hi! I think your lead is well done and follows all the guidelines! It also includes topics that are now yet well researched in the literature which is great!

Content:

The content you have added is definitely relevant to the subject at hand! However, I would like to note that some of your sources are older than 10 years and is not likely to be as reliable as your more recent sources. I would ask Robin if you could still have those sources added to your article!

Tone and Balance:

Your tone is neutral!

Sources and References

As I said before, not all your sources are current and I'm not totally sure whether you are better not using them and finding new ones or using them if there is no other literature about the topic!

Also, you have one source that gets repeated: Australian echinoderms : biology, ecology and evolution. Marie Byrne, Tim O'Hara, CSIRO. Clayton South, VIC. 2017. ISBN 978-1-4863-0763-0. OCLC 960042778.

It's really good that you guys have way more than the minimum that our assignment asked of us

Your references look like they come from reliable sources and your links work!

Organization

I think your content is also well organized! I will say that maybe you should add links to other Wikipedia articles for your section?

(as of 04/13, I also think you should move your taxonomy section to top before Anatomy and Morphology! I do think it's a little strange that you'd be mentioning Taxonomy near the end of the article.)

Images and Media

I'm not sure how easy it is for you to find more images for your article, but I think one or two more would be appreciated!

Overall

I think your article is pretty well written and concise! The only thing that I think needs work is to double check your sources that are on the older side (10+), fix one of your sources, and adding links to other relevant Wikipedia articles! Otherwise, you guys did a great job and you've definitely made the article more complete in my opinion! :)

-Susenna

Thanks! This was really helpful -Rea and Sydney