User:Sydney Martinelli/sandbox

If the amniotic sac breaks early into pregnancy, the potential of introducing bacteria in the amniotic fluid can increase, yet administering antibiotics maternally can potentially prevent chorioamnionitis and allow for a longer pregnancy. In addition, it has been shown that it is not necessary to deliver the fetus quickly after chorioamnionitis is diagnosed, so a C-section is not necessary unless it is necessary for maternal reasons. However, research has found that beginning labor early at approximately 34 weeks can lessen the likelihood of fetal death, and reduce the potential for excessive infection within the mother.

Proposed Peer Review for Group #1 : Breast Prostheses


 * The group's edits substantially improve the article, and the group added many important sections, specifically listing types of surgeries where a breast prostheses could be used, as well as explaining the surgery, adding information about the style of prostheses offered, and including insurance as a possible consideration when offering a breast prostheses. I believe that the group can include more sub-headers under each surgery guided from Wikipedia's "Guiding framework," including headers such as "medical uses" of each surgery or "risk/complications" of using the prostheses after each of the surgeries. In addition, the group can use headers mimicking the headers that the "Guiding framework" provides, such as including side effects of the prostheses, manufacturing, and including a header explaining history of prostheses, instead of including history in the introductory paragraph.
 * Overall, I believe the group achieved its goals for improvement, as they have rearranged their headings, evaluated their introductory paragraph, added more information to each heading and sub-heading, as well as re-arranged overall topics to provide the article better organization. I believe that each of these changes led to an overall improvement in the article and its quality.


 * All of the sources included were freely available to the public. However, I'm unsure if some of the sources are reputable secondary sources. For example, consider replacing articles such as the blog post on the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute site, or the post written by the Seattle Cancer Care Institute, with other articles such as Pubmed secondary sources. In addition, the sub-heading "Transgender" is missing proper citations explaining breast enhancement in this population. Including citations here can largely add to the quality of the page and specifically this section, along with making the page more reputable.