User:Sydneym33/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lady Literate in Arts (Lady Literate in Arts)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose this article randomly but I am interested in women's rights and college and was curious about what Lady Literate in arts was. It matters because it shows how women differed from men when getting an education. The LLA was the closest thing a women to get to that of a Masters of Arts. It matters because it shows how women and earning a degree came a long way in the UK. My preliminary impression of the article was that it held good introduction and context information. I wished the article was a little more detailed. For instance, exactly when did the LLA become not as used and when could women get a normal degree like a man? Also, is a LLA still a thing?

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introduction paragraph concisely addresses and introduces the topic. There are no major sections to the article, so it makes sense why the author did not have a sentence that addressed any major sections. The article is concise but could include some more details here and there. The content of the article is very much relevant to the topic because the article talks about the Lady Literate in Arts (LLA). The article is up to date, being last edited on November 25, 2021. The article is neutral when talking about education opportunities of women in the 1800s-1900s. The article overall could have been longer but it was very informational despite its length.