User:Szafraniect1/Legal Status of the Moon/Karliferguson Peer Review

Sources and reference's-

-Sources are not correctly sited, the ones outlined in red state that. Maybe add a little more to the short description of what your using the article's for and what specific info you are taking from that article.

- I struggled to have access to link 1 and 5.

-You used good links that have a lot of history background, which is good for your topic.

Organization-

-I think you should space your reference's and your paragraph's.

-I dont see many spelling errors, however I would suggest writing more, im assuming you aren't done yet.

Images and media-

-their are no images

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I thought the lead was good and included a lot of good information about the major points in the article. I also do not believe the lead was over detailed and thought it was concise and included the information that was needed in order to understand what we are reading about. The content was also solid and relevant to the topic I thought the article did a good job at filling a gap under health issues in athletics. The information that is already there is good but I would see if you could maybe find a few more relevant facts about it, it would only make the article better. The tone and balance overall was good and stayed neutral throughout the article, and did not pick one side over the other. I also thought all of the different view points in the article were displayed equally and no one side had more than the other. I thought the sources were good, and there was good history supporting your topic. There were no images on the article. Overall I would say the article was pretty solid but i would try and add a few extra facts if possible and I think it will be a perfect article.