User:T01H98/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Anandamide

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I wanted to learn about something new. I was unfamiliar with anandamide and what it did so I chose this article so that I can learn something interesting. This article matters because it allowed me to have insight about the types of neurotransmitters in our bodies. My first impression was that the article was laid out very well and had a lot of links to words I did not know the meaning of which was very helpful.

Evaluate the article
The lead of the article was brief and gave a good definition of the topic. The remaining content of the article stayed on track with the original topic and gave plenty of relevant information on the subject. The content also seems up to date as far as I can tell. The article defines anandamide with statements and facts rather than any opinionated information. The article has several references and links within it and also includes two external links to other articles. The article seems to be well written with no obvious grammatical errors. The language is very professional though to readers uneducated in the subject, some terms may be difficult to understand. However, most words have links attached to an additional definition. the article includes a few images that are mostly chemical formulas or basic images. Despite these images being simple, it still adds helpful insight to the article. The talk page was very helpful and included research on the subject and other articles that branch out on the subject. There were also helpful suggestions for change in the Wikipedia article. Overall, since this is my first review, I think the article was well written and reviewed. The information included a lot of complicated words and definitions but I was eventually able to better understand the article due to the right amount of information given.